Prasenjit Roy v. Kajal Parija

16.02.2023 SL No.1 Court No.8 (gc) FAT 268 of 2022 CAN 1 of 2022 Prasenjit Roy Vs.

Kajal Parija Mr. Meghnad Dutta, Mr. Abhishek Shaw, ...for the Petitioner/Appellant.

The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that he has received instruction not to proceed with the appeal. It appears that the application under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was filed within one year of marriage and on that ground the application was dismissed.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that more than one year has passed and the appellant is now taking appropriate steps in accordance with law.

Since we do not find any infirmity in the order under challenge, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. However, this order of dismissal shall not prevent the appellant to take appropriate steps in accordance with law for dissolution of marriage.

Accordingly, the appeal and the application stand dismissed.

All interim orders, if any, stand vacated.

L.C.R., if arrived, be sent down to the Trial Court. (Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)