Rejaul Sk @ Rijaul Karim Sk And Others v. State Of West Bengal

30.09.2022 42,49,50,64-66 Ct. No. 29 AD/KC REJECTED C.R.M.(A) 4769 of 2022 With C.R.M.(A) 4777 of 2022 With C.R.M.(A) 4778 of 2022 With C.R.M.(A) 4810 of 2022 With C.R.M.(A) 4812 of 2022 With C.R.M.(A) 4813 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 280 of 2022 dated 07.05.2022 under Sections 147/148/149/448/325/326/307 /380 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and read with Sections 3/ 4 of the E.C. Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act. And In Re : Rejaul Sk. @ Rijaul Karim Sk. & Ors.

...... petitioners Mr. Abhijit Kumar Adhya ....for the petitioners Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Mr. P. C. Majhi ....for the State in CRM(A) 4769 of 2022 Mr. S. S. Imam Mr. Arabinda Manna ....for the State in CRM(A) 4777 of 2022 Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Ms. Baisakhi Chatterjee ....for the State in CRM(A) 4778 of 2022 Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ....for the State in CRM(A) 4810 of 2022 Ms. Anasuya Sinha Ms. S. Patel ....for the State in CRM(A) 4812 of 2022

Mr. S. S. Imam Mr. R. Jana ....for the State in CRM(A) 4813 of 2022 Petitioners submit First Information Report (FIR) was registered against 114 persons. They have been falsely implicated. They pray for anticipatory bail. Learned lawyer opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. he submits a large number of persons including the petitioners threw bombs. They mercilessly assaulted the victims resulting in grievous injuries. Gold and other valuables were stolen from their houses.

We have considered the materials on record. Statements of witnesses disclose a sinister picture. A large number of persons came to the village. They threw bombs and looted the villagers. Number of victims were injured. Medical papers show grievous and life threatening injuries on the victim. Petitioners are named in the FIR as well as in the statements of the witnesses. In view of the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioners in the crime, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected and the applications being CRM (A) 4769 of 2022, CRM (A) 4777 of 2022, CRM (A) 4778 of 2022, CRM (A) 4810 of 2022, CRM (A) 4812 of 2022 and CRM (A) 4813 of 2022 are dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)