← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4814/2022allowed

Md. Asif Iqbal v. State Of West Bengal

2022-10-31Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

31.10.2022 Serial no. 78 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed) CRM (A) 4814 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Malda Police Station Case No. 330 of 2022 dated 27.07.2022 under Sections 417/376/313/506/298/109 of the Indian Code corresponding to General Diary Reference No. 1283 of 2022. -AndIn the matter of : Md. Asif Iqbal ... ... Petitioner Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, ld. Sr. adv.

Mr. Upendra Ray, Mr. Faiyaz Ahmed Khan, Md. Mustafa, Ms. Kanchan Roy,, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Sujan Chatterjee, Advocate ... ...For the State Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury, Md. Zeeshan Uddin, Advocates .. ...For the de facto complainant Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the police complaint is a result of a previous relationship turning sour.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary including the statement of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code as also to the statement she made at the time of her medical examination.

Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant submits that the de facto complainant was made

to undergo abortion by the petitioner. Moreover, the de facto complainant was assaulted by the petitioner.

The statement of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code acknowledges a pre-existing relationship between her and the petitioner. The police complainant lodged by the de facto complainant also narrates about the existing relationship. She acknowledged her relationship with the petitioner before the Medical Officer examining her.

Both the petitioner and the de facto complainant are adults. The de facto complainant was aware of the consequences of her action.

In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 4814 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)