← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3377/2025allowed

Sk. Reajuddin v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-11-11Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

11.11.2025 Sl. No.69 Ct. 28 NB CRM (A) 3377 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bidhannagar Cyber Crime PS Case No.106/2025 dated 04.09.2025 under Sections 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and 72/72(A) of Information Technologh Act, 2000. And In the matter of: Sk. Reajuddin ... petitioner Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu, Mr. Anindya Sundar Das, Mr. Jannat ul Firdous, Mr. S. K. Babulal, Ms. Suva Gayen, Ms. Paramita Mondal, Mr. Suman Halder.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Suman De, Mr. S. Balial.

...for the State.

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

Perused the case diary.

It is alleged that the petitioner as an employee of a Telephone Company has shared a list of customers of the said company with others.

It also appears that during pendency of this application, the petitioner has complied with the notice issued by the Investigating Officer and met him.

Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till submission of report in final form.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)