← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4842/2022allowed

Samir Panda And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-11-09Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

09.11.2022 Serial no. 18 [Dd] (Anticipatory Bail) (Ptn. 1- dismissed as infructuous Petn. 2- Allowed) CRM (A) 4842 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Haldia Women Police Station Case No. 60 dated August 30, 2022 under Sections 376/417/323/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Samir Panda & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Navanil De, Mr. Srinjan Ghosh, Mr. Subhrajit Dey, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Avik Ghatak, Advocates ... ...For the State CRM (A) 4842 of 2022 is dismissed as infructuous for far as the first petitioner (Samir Panda) is concerned since he was taken into custody. The first petitioner was granted bail by the jurisdictional Court.

Apparently, the police case emanates out of a relationship turning sour.

In view of the principal co-accused being granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and in view of the materials in the case suggesting that the police case emanate out of a relationship turning sour, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no. 2 (Fatu Panda @ Sukanta Panda). Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner no. 2 (Fatu Panda @ Sukanta Panda) shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner no. 2 shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner no. 2 shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner no. 2 in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 2 is allowed.

CRM (A) 4842 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)