← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4264/2023dismissed as rejected

Papan Mandal And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2024-01-02Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

02.01.2024 Serial no. 47 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd CRM (A) 4264 of 2023 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baishnab nagar Police Station Case No. 452 of 2023 dated 14.07.2023 under Sections 10/12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 (POCSO Case No. 50/2023 ) -AndIn the matter of : Papan Mondal & Anr.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Md. Wasim Akram, Advocate ... ...For the de facto complainant Md. Anwar Hossain, Advocate .. ...For the State Petition is taken up for consideration subsequent to order dated October 16, 2023.

By such order, interim anticipatory bail was granted by the co-ordinate Bench.

It is submitted at the Bar that the co-ordinate Bench did not consider the materials in the case diary and passed such order in view of the ensuing Puja vacation.

We perused the materials in the case diary.

The victim is a minor and recorded a statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code where, she claims that she was disrobed at the point of knife by both the petitioners and offensive pictures were taken which were made viral.

Materials in the case diary suggest that offensive photographs of the victim were taken and circulated.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners in the incident as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to confirm the interim anticipatory bail granted on October 16, 2023 or grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 4264 of 2023 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)