Tapas Kumar Bandyopadhyay v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

24.09.2024 Ct.18 W.P.A. 23561 of 2024 rkd Tapas Kumar Bandyopadhya -vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Mrinal Kanti Sardar, Ms. Aparna Mandal ....for the petitioner.

Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty ....for the State.

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court is kept with the record.

At the time of call no one appears on behalf of the State respondents in spite of service of notice.

Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty, learned advocate who is present in Court and who normally represents the State respondents is requested to enter appearance on behalf of State respondents. Let engagement of Ms. Chakraborty be regularized by the office of the learned Government Pleader.

The writ petitioner is a retired Headmaster, who superannuated on 29th February, 2016. On superannuation of the writ petitioner, first Pension Payment Order was issued on 1st February, 2016 and as per the first Pension Payment Order disbursement of retiral dues was made in favour of

the petitioner. Subsequently, due to revision of pay as per ROPA 2019 revised Pension Payment Order was issued on 2nd March, 2021. The writ petitioner claims interest on revised gratuity as per revised Pension Payment Order.

Accordingly, the Director of Pension Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned Treasury Officer are directed to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum to the writ petitioner on revised gratuity as per revised pension payment order from 14th February, 2020 till the date of actual disbursement of the revised gratuity amount in favour of the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)