← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPCRC/20/2025disposed

Kakali Mondal v. Arup Sengupta

2025-04-25Hon'Ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha3 pages

25.04.2025 Court No.13 Item Nos. 11 to 14 sp CPAN 319 of 2025 In WPA 24875 of 2022 Arijit Debnath and Ors.

Vs.

Sri. Debabrata Sarkar, The Chairman, District Primary School Council, North 24-Parganas & Anr.

With WPCRC 19 of 2025 In WPA 24875 of 2022 Manoj Sarkar and Ors.

Vs.

Sri Arup Sengupta, The Commissioner of School Education With WPCRC 20 of 2025 In WPA 20966 of 2022 With CAN 1 of 2024 With CAN 2 of 2024 Kakali Mondal and Ors.

Vs.

Mr. Arup Sengupta, The Commissioner of School Education and Anr. With WPCRC 22 of 2025 In WPA 8094 of 2022 Joyanti Saren Vs.

Sri Debabrata Sarkar, The Chairman, District Primary School Council & Ors. Mr. Subir Sanyal, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Ratul Biswas, Mr. Somesh Ghosh Mr. Sourojit Mukherjee ... For the Petitioner in CPAN 319 of 2025 and WPCRC 19 of 2025.

Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Rajit Lal Maitra ... For the Petitioner in WPCRC 20 of 2025.

Mr. Sandip Kumar De Mr. Abhijit Sarkar ... For the Petitioner in WPCRC 22 of 2025.

Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Avishek Prasad Mr. N. Chatterjee Mr. T. Chakraborty Ms. Kalpita Paul ... For the alleged contemnors in WPCRC 19 of 2025 . Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Senior Standing Counsel Ms. Tapati Samanta Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Avishek Prasad Mr. Saaqib Siddiqui Ms. Kalpita Paul ... For the alleged contemnors in WPCRC 20 of 2025. Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Avishek Prasad Mr. T. Chakraborty Ms. Kalpita Paul ... For the alleged contemnors in WPCRC 22 of 2025. Mr. Arabindo Chatterjee, ld. Senior Advocate Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya ... For the DPSC, North 24-Parganas.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order in question has been complied with in respect of all the petitioners. The same is confirmed by Mr. Arabindo Chatterjee and Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, learned Senior Advocates for the DPSC and the State respectively.

2.

In that view of the matter, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the contempt applications. 3.

All the contempt applications shall stand disposed of. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.

4.

There shall be no order as to costs.

5.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)