Parimal Pattak v. C.E.S.C.

19.11.2025 Court No.23 DL/Item No.-86 [Milan] WPA 23667 of 2006 Parimal Pathak versus C.E.S.C Ltd. & Ors.

Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee ....for the CESC

1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought for.

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on earlier occasion.

3. CESC is represented by the learned counsel.

4. This case is pending since 2006, almost 19 years have passed.

5. In view of the above facts, it seems that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the instant case.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition being WPA 23667 of 2006 is dismissed for default without any order as to costs.

7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

8. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court without insisting upon production of a certified copy thereof.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)