Sakir Halder v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

04.03.2024 Ct. No. 11 rrc WPLRT 114 of 2023 (Sakir Halder Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee Mr. Souvik Das Mr. M. Raihan Ahmed Mr. Rudranil Das Mr. Soumava Santra Mr. Tapas Chatterjee ..... For the petitioner Mr. Supratim Dhar ..... For the State This writ petition has been instituted praying for a direction upon the learned tribunal to dispose of the two original applications registered as OA No. 2866 of 2019 and OA No. 3679 of 2022.

Mr.

Mukherjee, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that by an order dated 2nd July, 2019 passed in an appeal being LRA No. 587 of 2018, the DL&LRO concerned has directed the BL&LRO to rectify the record of rights by deleting the name of the private respondent within a time specified in the order. He contends that despite being so directed, the B.L.& L.R.O. did not implement the order dated2nd July, 2019. The petitioner was constrained to prefer an original application being OA No. 3679 of 2022 but the same is pending for adjudication before the learned tribunal since long back. He prays for appropriate direction upon the learned Tribunal to dispose of the original application preferred by him to get the order dated 2nd July, 2019 implemented.

Mr. Dhar, learned advocate enters appearance on behalf of the State.

Despite service no one appears on behalf of the private respondent.

Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. Perused the materials on records.

Record reveals that challenging the order dated 2nd July, 2019, the private respondent also preferred one original application being OA No. 2866 of 2019. Since the identical issues are involved in both the original applications, both the original applications were directed to be heard analogously. We have been informed that the next date of hearing of both the original applications has been fixed on 21st May, 2024. In such conspectus, it is expected that both the original applications shall be disposed of by the learned tribunal on the next date of hearing or as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)