Rupam Goswami v. The State Of West Bengal

27.11.2025 Court No.28 Item No.37 ssi CRM (A) 3579 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Bagdah PS Case No.661 of 2025 dated 02.08.2025 under Sections 34, 420, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 (5), 318 (4), 351 (2) of BNS 2023. And In the matter of: Rupam Goswami ....Applicant/Petitioner.

Mr. Kamal Das Ms. Shweta Singh Ms. Sudipta Mandal Mrs. Dipanweta Das Dey ...for the petitioner Ms. Subhashree Patel Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ..for the State Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

Perused the case diary.

The prosecution case is that a loan was taken but was only partly paid.

Considering the nature of allegations and the materials available in the case diary, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses and shall cooperate with the investigation. The petitioner shall meet the I.O. once a fortnight till submission of report in final form. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Jay Sengupta, J.)