← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/24385/2024disposed

Indrajit Gayen v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2026-06-08Hon'Ble Justice Krishna Rao2 pages

S/L 20 08.06.2026 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 24385 of 2024 Sri Indrajit Gayen Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Bikash Chandra Das ...for the petitioner.

1.

None appears on behalf of the State and the private respondents.

2. In terms of the order dated March 30, 2026, the petitioner has sent the notice to the respondent no. 8 but the same was returned with the endorsement 'addressing un-located'. Let the postal cover be kept with the record.

3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that the private respondent nos. 7 and 8 have set up a grill workshop for making iron/steel doors, windows, collapsible gates and shutters etc. in the name of Ma Manasa Grill Centre just in front of the petrol pump of the petitioner on the road side land of the PWD.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner apprehends that due to the welding work there is every apprehension that at any point of time untoward fire incident may occur in the petrol pump of the petitioner which is just adjacent to the workshop of the private respondents. He further submits that the private respondents have set up their workshop in the Government land belongs to the PWD.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has made several representations to the authorities for taking appropriate

steps for removal of the workshop of the petitioner from the Government land which is also dangerous to the petrol pump of the petitioner but the authorities have not taken any steps.

6. Considered the submission made learned counsel for the petitioner perused the materials on record, this Court finds that the petitioner has already sent notice to the District Magistrate, Executive Engineer-II, PWD as well as the Assistant Engineer, Basirhat for taking appropriate steps against the private respondent nos. 7 and 8 but in spite of receipt of the said request no action has been taken.

7. Considering the above, this Court finds that no purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent no. 3, the District Magistrate, North 24 Parganas to consider the notice issued by the petitioner dated July 30, 2024 after hearing the parties and to pass a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

9. WPA 24385 of 2024 is disposed of.

10. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities.

(Krishna Rao, J.)