Biswajit Sarkar v. State Of West Bengal

03.11.2025 Court No.35.

M/L. 32.

Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1876 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Murutia Police Station Case No. 204/2024 dated 08.07.2024 under Section 329(3)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5)/103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Biswajit Sarkar ......Petitioner.

Mr. Joydip Biswas Mr. Asraf Mondal ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Mr. Sarthak Mondal ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner surrendered before the learned Magistrate on or about 22.07.2025 and since then he is in custody. According to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, similarly placed accused persons have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench.

Learned advocate for the State has drawn the attention of the Court to the evidence of certain eye witnesses as also neighbours.

I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary and the order passed in CRM (DB) 835 of 2025. Having regard to the same, I am of the view that the petitioner

is similarly situated with the accused persons who has been released on bail.

As such the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Tehatta.

If on bail, the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of Murutia Police Station except for the purposes of attending the Court. In case there are exigencies, petitioner will seek permission from the learned ACJM, Tehatta or the learned Trial Court.

Petitioner shall also make himself available on each and every date so fixed by the learned Magistrate/the Trial Court. In case there are violations of any conditions, the learned Magistrate or the Trial Court would be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference of this Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM(M) 1876 of 2025 is allowed.

Case diary be returned to the learned Advocate appearing for the State.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)