Md. Abid v. State Of West Bengal

06.11.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 8.

sudipta (Allowed) CRM (M) 2147 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with STF Police Station Case No. 12 of 2025 dated 28.05.2025 under Sections 61(2) / 179 / 180 of the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita Act, 2023. And In the matter of : Md. Abid ......Petitioner Mr. Shaila Afrui Mr. Yusuf Ali ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Imran Ali Mr. S. Balial ......for the State.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 158 days and there has been no recovery from the petitioner yet. Unnecessarily, he has been detained even after the investigation has been concluded and chargesheet has been submitted. Learned Advocate for the State has produced the Case Diary and submitted that at the relevant point of time of commission of alleged offence there was communication between the petitioner and the accused from whom the seizure has been affected. The principal accused has also admitted regarding the complicity of the present petitioner. The phone

number / SIM card which was used by the present petitioner was found to be fake and belonging to another person. Be that as it may, I have taken into account the materials in the Case Diary and prima facie of the view so far as the present petitioner is concerned, considering his complicity further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted. Thus, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner i.e. Md. Abid shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Calcutta. If on bail, the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of Kolkata Police Station without the leave of the learned Trial Court. Petitioner shall also be physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court.

In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions stated above, the learned Trial Court would be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.

Accordingly, CRM (M) 2147 of 2025 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)