Suvradip Halder v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

D/L 119 25.11.2025 C.R.M. (M) 1924 of 2025 In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Chandannagar Police Station Case No.130/2025 dated 14.07.2025 under Sections 127(2)/351(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023;

Suvradip Halder

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Anjan Bhattacharya Ms. Anita Shaw Ms. Seema Thakur.

...for the petitioner.

Ms. Zareen N. Khan Mr. Karan Bapuli.

...for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits Bpg.

Allowed that the petitioner is in custody for 131 days and the investigation has already been concluded.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. of the victim minor boys.

I have taken into account the case diary, the statement of the witnesses and on overall assessment of the facts of the case, I am of the view that further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Suvradip Halder shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of

whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO Court, Chandannagar, Hooghly. If on bail, the petitioner shall attend the learned trial court on each and every date of trial. Petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Chandannagar Police Station except for the purpose of attending the court without the permission of the learned trial court.

Accordingly, CRM (M) 1924 of 2025 is allowed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)