Alfaj Sk. v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

D/L 3 12.12.2025 C.R.M. (M) 1960 of 2025 In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023filed in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No.537 of 2024 dated 23.07.2024 under Sections 64(2)(m)/318(2)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and adding Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and charge-sheet submitted under Sections 64(2)(m)/318(2)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and adding Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012;

Alfaj Sk.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Satadru Lahiri Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Safdar Azam Mr. Raja Das.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Ms. Suveni Banerjee.

...for the State.

Mr. Joydeep Biswas Mr. Asraf Mandal Mr. Tanbir Mandal.

...for the de facto complainant.

Bpg.

Dismissed Report submitted by the State reflects that the CFDEEL conducted their analysis and on an analysis it was found that there were obscene materials available.

Having regard to the report submitted by the State, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. However, State would take steps for expediting the trial as only two witnesses have been examined out of the proposed 13

witnesses.

Accordingly, CRM(M)1960 of 2025 is dismissed. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Copy of the report be handed over to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner.

Learned trial court would fix schedule on each and every month and ensure that the trial is progressed reasonably in future. The investigating officer of the case is present in Court today. His further appearance before this Court is dispensed with. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)