Mafijul Sk. And ANR v. The State Of West Bengal

22.01.2025 Item no. 57.

Court No.29.

AB (Rejected) CRM (DB) 3414 of 2024 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Salar P.S. Case No.193 of 2024 Dated 26.06.2024 under Sections 489B/489C/34 of the Indian Penal Code And In the matter of : Mafijul Sk. & Anr.

......Petitioners.

Mr. J. I. Hossain ......for the Petitioners.

Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta, ld. APP Mr. Mainak Gupta ......for the State.

Dictated by Apurba Sinha Ray, J.

1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They are in custody for more than six months. There is no chance of their fleeing away from the course of justice and as such, they may be granted bail on any condition.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. According to him, there are sufficient incriminating materials against the present petitioners since Indian fake currency notes have been seized from their possession. Charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. The prosecution will adduce only 11 witnesses. If the petitioners are enlarged on bail, the prosecution may suffer.

Signed By :

APURBA BANDYOPADHYAY High Court of Calcutta 27 th of January 2025 04:42:05 PM

3.

We have considered the materials on record including the CD. Seizure List of Indian fake currency notes has been produced before us. We think that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the present petitioners and as such, we are not inclined to enlarge them on bail, at this stage.

4.

The prayer for bail is rejected.

5.

CRM (DB) 3414 of 2024 is dismissed.

6.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)