Gouri Rom v. Purba Bardhaman Municipality & ORS

18.08.2025 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 25 SM WPA 22176 of 2019 Gouri Rom

Versus

The Purba Burdhaman Municipality & Ors.

Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborti .....for the petitioner 1.

The writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondents mainly respondent no. 2, the Administrator of Purba Bardhaman Municipality to take immediate steps for the demolition of the unauthorized construction made by the respondent no. 3 at Ward No. 17 and holding no. 139.

2.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that several representations have been made to the respondent no. 2 but no action has been taken.

3.

It is further submitted that presently there has been a change in the administration of the said Municipality and there is a Chairman and other authorities who have taken charge of the Municipality and the respondent no. 2, who was temporarily in charge has handed over charge to the present authorities.

4.

On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to make a representation before the present authorities of the

concerned municipality ventilating the grievance as raised in the present writ application and the said authorities shall consider the same in accordance with law and on hearing the parties, pass a reasoned order preferably within 60 days from the date of filing of such representation.

5.

Writ application stands disposed of.

6.

Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently.

7.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

8.

Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.

[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]