Md. Atique Farhad v. Earshad Sultan And ORS.

27. 11.10.2023 Court No.6 .Tanmoy Ghosh MAT 1982 of 2023 Md. Atique Farhad -VersusEarshad Sultan & Ors.

With IA No: CAN/1/2023 With IA No: CAN/2/2023 Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Utsa Dutta, Adv., Mr. Souvik Das, Adv., Mr. K.R. Ahmed, Adv., Mr. Rudranil Das, Adv.

...for the applicant/appellant.

Mr. Ramij Munsi, Adv.

...for the respondent no.1.

Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Ankit Sureka, Adv., Mr. Sobhan Majumder, Adv.

...for the Howrah Municipal Corporation.

In Re: IA No: CAN/2/2023 The intending appellant was not a party to the writ petition. However, being aggrieved by the impugned order he proposed to prefer an appeal. Hence this application for leave to appeal.

However, at the time of moving the application, learned Advocate for the applicant says that he has instructions not to press this application.

Accordingly, the application being IA No:

CAN/2/2023 is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal

being MAT 1982 of 2023 and the connected application being IA No: CAN/1/2023 shall also stand dismissed. (Arijit Banerjee, J.) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)