Sk. Isha Haque @ Sk. Ishaque v. State Of West Bengal

10.02.2026 Court No.35.

M/L. 158.

Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 2232 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Kolaghat Police Station Case No. 735 of 2023 dated 21.11.2023 under Sections 302/394/397 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act.

And In the matter of : Sk. Isha Haque @ Sk. Ishaque ......Petitioner.

Mr. Abhra Mukherjee Mr. Sudip Banerjee Mr. Sauradeep Dutta Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee Mr. Himadree Ghosh ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee ....for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 807 days and only 11 witnesses out of the cited 29 witnesses in the charge sheet have been examined. None of the witnesses till date has expressed any complicity so far as the present petitioner is concerned and as such at this stage the prayer for bail of the petitioner be allowed.

On the other hand, learned advocate for the State has drawn the attention of the Court to the seizure list which reflect

that the recovery in the case, so far as the fire arms as well as the jewelleries are concerned, were pursuant to the statement of the present petitioner. The said seizure list witnesses are yet to be examined as is reflected from the charge sheet as well as the seizure list.

Having considered the same, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are over. At this stage, CRM (M) 2232 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)