Salam Sk. @ Abdus Salam v. State Of West Bengal

04.11.2025 Serial no. 25 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2157 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with G.R. Case No. 1256 of 2025 arising out of Kandi Police Station Case being No. 313 of 2025 dated 22.06.2025 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109(1)/3(5) of the BNS.

-AndIn the matter of : Salam Sk. @ Abdus Salam ... ... Petitioner(s) Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu Md. Jannat ul Firdous ... for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Binay Kr. Panda Mr. Akash Ganguly ... for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Manas Kumar Das ... For the Defacto-complainant Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than four months. Learned advocate also submits that as charge-sheet has already been submitted in the instant case, on any stringent condition(s) the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State draws the attention of the court to the injury report and submits that grievous injury was committed at the behest of the present petitioner.

Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant is present and opposes the prayer for bail on the ground of

culpability as well as complicity of the present petitioner in the instant case.

Be that as it may, having regard to the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that further custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Salam Sk. @ Abdus Salam shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Kandi.

If on bail, the petitioner shall make himself available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and/or the learned Magistrate in seisin of the matter. The petitioner shall also cooperate with the trial of the case and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned Magistrate and/or the trial court. In case, there is any violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate and/or the learned trial court in seisin of the matter would be entitled to cancel the bail without further reference of this court. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2157 of 2025 is allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)