Kalam Molla v. State Of West Bengal

25.11.2025 Court No.28 Item No.45 tbsr Allowed CRM (A) 3607 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dholahat P.S. Case No.676 of 2025 dated 17.10.2025 under Sections 318(2)/316(2)/318(4)/351(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of: Kalam Molla ....Petitioner.

Mr. Sandip Kumar Mondal Mr. Sumit Routh ...for the petitioner Ms. Subhasree Patel Ms. Rajashree Tah ....for the State Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

Perused the case diary.

It appears that the prime grievance of the de facto complainant that his car had gone missing was redressed. It had been recovered. Charge sheet was submitted. The petitioner also complied with the notice issued by the Investigating Officer.

Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding

to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses and shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)