Binode Behari Das v. Mahendra Shaw

AG 14.12.

C.O. 3377 of 2022 M Sri Binode Behari Das Vs Sri Mahendra Shaw / RKB Ct Mr. Arjun Samanta, ... For the petitioner.

The only contention raised by the petitioner is against the delay caused in the disposal of the suit, which was instituted in the year 2012.

Incidentally, it is submitted that issue has not yet been framed.

No other point is raised requiring address by this Court.

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be made in the case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary.

Service upon the opposite party is thus dispensed with.

Accordingly, learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Bidhannagar is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of ejectment suit being Ejectment Suit No 65 of 2012, after causing disposal of interlocutory application, if there be any pending, subject to the suitability and convenience of the Court below, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting

unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the learned advocate appearing in the court below for the opposite party and the opposite party.

While endeavouring such exercise, the mark of commencement of trial of instant suit may be made preferably before the end of March, 2023.

With this observation and direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J)