← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2172/2025rejected

Akramul Mondal @ Surat @ Ekramul Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

2025-11-19Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

D/L 15 19.11.2025 Bpg.

dismissed C.R.M. (M) 2172 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 / under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Thanarpara Police Station Case No.67 of 2024 dated 16.03.2024 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ;

Akramul Mondal @ Surat @ Ekramul Mondal

Versus

The State of West Bengal Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh Ms. Ankusha Ghosh.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Arindam Sen Mr. Soumyadip Saha.

...for the State.

Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhuri.

...for the de facto complainant.

Petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year 8 months and there is no scope of the trial commencing in near future as some of the accused persons are absconding. It has been submitted that the petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused persons who have been released on bail by this Court in CRM (M) 1863 of 2025, CRM(M) 1873 of 2025 and CRM(M) 1979 of 2025, as such, the same benefit may be extended to the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there were recovery of offending weapon at the behest of the present petitioner and the petitioner, as such, is not similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been granted bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the present petitioner is thickly connected with the offence.

Be that as it may, I find from the seizure list dated 16.03.2024 at the instance of the present petitioner the offending weapon was recovered from him.

Having considered that the present petitioner is not similarly situated as the other accused persons, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M)2172 of 2025 is dismissed. Report so submitted be kept with the record.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)