Sujit Singha v. State Of West Bengal

21.11.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 73.

Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2197 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Pukhuria Station Case No. 526 of 2023 dated 16.11.2023 under Sections 498A/302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In the matter of : Sujit Singha ......Petitioner.

Ms. Minoti Gomes ......for the Petitioner.

Ms. Sukanya Bhattacharyya Ms. Puspita Saha ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for bail as the petitioner is in custody for two years. Learned advocate submits that there is hardly any incriminating materials appearing against the present petitioner and he has been falsely implicated on the allegations of murdering his wife. Learned advocate for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail and produced the Case Diary. Attention of the Court was drawn to the relevant statements including that of the child.

Having considered that five witnesses have been examined out of the proposed 26 witnesses by the prosecution, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2197 of 2025 is dismissed.

State is directed to conclude at least 10 witnesses within the period of six months from the next date so fixed by the learned trial Court.

No unnecessary adjournment be granted to any of the parties and the trial of the case would proceed in spite of the resolution of the local bar.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)