← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3647/2025partly allowed

Ritabrata Banerjee And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

2025-11-26Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

26/11/2025 D/L - 46 Court No.28 S. Kundu Partly Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3647 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Baduria P.S case no. 584 of 2025 dated 20.10.2025 under Sections 108/3(5) of the BNS.

In the matter of: Ritabrata Banerjee & Ors.

...Petitioners.

Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder Ms. Sagnika Banerjee Ms. Triparna Roy ...for the petitioners.

Md. Bani Israil Mr. Sayed Md. Sayed Mr. A. Basu ...for the de-facto complainant.

Ms. Sreyashee Biswas Ms. Debadrita Mondal ...for the State.

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. Perused the case diary.

3. Considering the materials available in the case diary including the statement of the brother of the victim girl as also the statements of neighbours and the alleged roles ascribed to each of the petitioners, while I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 (Pampa Banerjee and Kalyan Banerjee) and the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 1 is rejected.

4. In the event of arrest, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-

each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the said petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The petitioner no. 3 shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till submission of report in final form.

5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed-in-part.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)