Milon Sk v. State Of West Bengal

06.11.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 13.

Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2198 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 941 of 2024 dated 27.10.2024 under sections 109/117(2)/126(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Milon Sk.

......Petitioner.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Tasnim Ahamed Mr. Dhiman Banerjee Mr. Ezaz Ahmed ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than 1 year and the investigation having been concluded, charge sheet has been submitted and the case after being committed is at the stage of evidence.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that after framing of charge date has been fixed for evidence of the first few prosecution witnesses. I have considered the period of detention of the present petitioner. Having regard to the period of detention, I am of the opinion, further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Krishnanagar, Nadia.

If on bail, the petitioner shall stay within the jurisdiction of Kaliganj Police Station and will leave the said jurisdiction of the said police station only for the purposes of attending the Court. The petitioner shall twice in a week meet the Inspectorin-Charge or any Officer delegated by him and obtain an acknowledgement till the trial court is satisfied that the examination of the vulnerable witnesses are over. The petitioner shall also provide his contact number/mobile number to the Inspector-in-Charge or the Officer delegated. If on bail the petitioner shall ensure that no contact is established with any of the witnesses of the present case. In case the learned Trial Court finds that there has been violations of conditions of bail irrespective of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court. Petitioner shall also make himself available on each and every date so fixed by the learned Magistrate/the Trial Court. In case there are violations of any conditions, the learned

Magistrate or the Trial Court would be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference of this Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM(M) 2198 of 2025 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)