Mihir Ghosh And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal
07.11.2025 Court No.35.
D/L. 23.
Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2227 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nabadwip Police Station Case No. 539 of 2023 dated 20.09.2023 under Sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
And In the matter of : Mihir Ghosh & Ors.
......Petitioners.
Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder Ms. Sangeeta Chakraborty ......for the Petitioners.
Ms. Z.N. Khan Ms. Rita Datta.
......for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that initially case was registered under Sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The present petitioners are the father-in-law and brother-in-laws of the deceased. Since the charge-sheet has already been submitted learned advocate for the petitioners prayed that on any stringent conditions petitioners may be released on bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary and draws the attention of the Court to the statements of the witnesses including the post-mortem report. The statement of the complainant Biswajit Ghosh under
Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has also been referred to.
On an assessment of the materials appearing in the Case Diary, I am of the opinion that further detention of the petitioners are unwarranted. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners namely, Mihir Ghosh, Dipankar Ghosh Subhankar Ghosh @ Sandip Ghosh is allowed.
Petitioners shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagar.
If on bail, the petitioners shall attend the learned Trial Court on each and every date fixed. The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Nadia without the leave of the learned Trial Court or the Court in seisin of the instant case.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 2227 of 2025 is allowed. Case Diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)