Kalpana Saha v. State Of West Bengal

26.11.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 219.

Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2239 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Pursurah Police Station Case No. 189 of 2025 dated 24.07.2025 under Sections 85/108/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Kalpana Saha ......Petitioner.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Suman Chakraborty ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Provash Kr. Bhattacharyya Ms. Ratna Ghosh ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 122 days and the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. Learned advocate submits that the investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted before the jurisdictional Court, as such on any stringent conditions the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and drawn the attention of the Court to the fact that within a year of marriage the incident took place. There are statement of witnesses which reflects that there was a dispute within the family and the same was continuous.

Be that as it may, having regard to the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner in un-called for. As such the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Petitioner namely, Kalpana Saha shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arambagh, Hooghly.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial Court in seisin of the case. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Hooghly without the prior permission of the learned trial Court in seisin of the case.

Accordingly, CRM (M) No. 2239 of 2025 is allowed. Case Diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)