Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2262/2025allowed

Shyamal Kumar Bhowmick @ Shyamal Bhowmick @ Bhaumik v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-11-11Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

D/L 33 11.11.2025 C.R.M. (M) 2262 of 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kalyani Police Station Case No.830 of 2025 dated 18th August, 2025 under Sections 64(2)/115(2)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Shyamal Kumar Bhowmick @ Shyamal Bhowmick @ Bhaumik.

Versus

State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar Ms. Deblina De Ms. Maitryee Das.

...for the petitioner.

Ms. Sonali Das Mr. Dipankar Paramanick.

...for the State.

Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the Bpg.

Allowed record.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 67 days and the investigation of the case has already been concluded. It has also been contended by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that he is aged 81 years and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case, as such, he prays for bail on any stringent conditions. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the case diary.

I have considered the materials appearing in the case diary. Having regard to the fact that charge-sheet has already been

submitted, the age of the accused and the attending materials appearing in the case diary, I am of the view that further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner namely, Shyamal Kumar Bhowmick @ Shyamal Bhowmick @ Bhaumik shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Kalyani. If on bail, the petitioner shall attend the court as and when called for and shall not leave the jurisdiction of Kalyani Police Station without the leave of the learned court in seisin of the present case.

Accordingly, CRM (M) 2262 of 2025 is allowed. Case diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)