Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/5333/2022dismissed as rejected

Pulin Bihari Maity And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-11-21Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi1 pages

21.11.2022 Serial no. 35 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) (Rejected) CRM (A) 5333 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Belda Police Station Case No. 445 of 2022 dated 09.10.2022 under Sections 498A/323/325/307/376(2)(f)/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 D.P. Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Pulin Bihari Maity & Ors. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Tarun Kr. Gayen, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Binay Panda, Ms. Puspita Saha, Advocates ... ...For the State The Statement of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code implicates all the petitioners.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 5333 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)