Ainul Haque And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

22.11.2022 Serial no. 29 [Dd] (Anticipatory Bail) (Allowed) CRM (A) 5357 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Raiganj Women Police Station Case No. 130 of 2022 dated 11.08.2022 under Sections 498(A)/354/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. No. 2093 of 2022. -AndIn the matter of : Ainul Haque & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, ld. PP Mr. Aniket Mitra, Advocates ... ...For the State Apparently, there are disputes between the family members.

There is no allegation against the husband in the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant. In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and

from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 5357 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)