Shyamal Kumar Paul v. Sudip Kumar Paul & ANR.

17.09.2024.

Court No. 13 Sl. No. 32 sp F.A.T. No. 459 of 2009 Shyamal Kumar Paul

Versus

Sudip Kumar Paul & Anr.

1. The appeal is more than about 15 years old.

2. Parties are not represented in an old appeal today. No accommodation is prayed for.

3. Hence, F.A.T 459 of 2009 shall stand dismissed for default.

4. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

5. In view of the above, connected applications, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

6. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Let the T.C.R. be returned, if any, to the Court below.

8. The registry shall communicate a copy of this order to the Court below.

9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)