Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4834/2023dismissed for default

Badre Alam Mirdda And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-22Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi1 pages

22.01.2024 Court No.29 Item No. 113 AP CRM (A) 4834 of 2023 In re : An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Mayureswar Police Station Case No. 77 of 2023 dated 08.07.2023 under Sections 447/326/379/427/34 of IPC.

-AndIn the matter of : Badre Alam Mirdda and Ors. ... ...Petitioners.

Mr. Sujan Chatterjee ... ...For the State.

Request for video conferencing was made on behalf of the petitioners.

Advocate for the petitioners making the request was allowed to enter the video conferencing facility. When the matter was taken up, he did not respond on the video conferencing platform.

In such circumstances, we consider that the petitioners are not to be represented at time of hearing. State is represented.

In such circumstances, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)