Ashish Jhunjhunwala v. Kotal Mahindra Bank Ltd

26.09.2025 p.b.

S.L. No.6-7.

Ct. No.23.

CRR 2925 of 2013 With CRR 2932 of 2013 Ashish Jhunjhunwala Vs.

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Ms. Ritu Das, Mr. Sutanu Karmakar.

.....for the petitioner.

1.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his client does not wish to proceed with the hearing of these two applications. 2.

Written instructions addressed to Learned counsel are taken on record.

3.

In view of the fact these two applications are dismissed as not pressed.

The other revision applications be detached from these revisional applications.

4.

All parties shall act in terms of the copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)