Arup De v. Ioc Ltd & ORS

9.4.2026 Court No. 10 AGM In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A 25024 of 2018 Arup De -versusIOC Ltd & Ors.

Mr. Abhinaba Dan.

Mr. M. Chakraborty.

...For the Petitioner.

Mr. Manwendra Singh Yadav.

Ms. Saswati Chatterjee.

... For the IOCL.

1.

The matter has appeared in the list under the heading 'To Be Mentioned' for correction of the order dated 25.3.2026.

2.

In the 1st line of the second paragraph at page no. 1 in the order sheet, the word 'petitioner' has been wrongly typed in stead of 'respondent/IOCL', 3.

In the 1st and the 2nd line of the third paragraph the words 'writ petitioner' has been wrongly typed in stead of 'respondent IOCL'. In the fourth line of the same paragraph the word 'respondent' has been wrongly typed in stead of 'writ petitioner'.

4.

The order dated 25.3.2026 is corrected accordingly. The remaining part of the said order will remain unaltered.

5.

Let this order be read along with the order dated 25.3.2026.

6.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

( Smita Das De, J.)