← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/3694/2024dismissed as rejected

Sentu Mandal v. State Of West Bengal

2025-02-13Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

13.02.2025 ADSL. 15 Court No.26 S.D.

CRM (DB) 3694 of 2024 In re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 785 of 2022 dated 20.05.2022 under Sections 449/302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. -AndIn the matter of: Sentu Mandal ... ... Petitioner Mr. M. Chatterjee Mr. Debapriya Majumder Mr. Arindam Paoli ... ... For the Petitioner Ms. Amita Gaur Ms. Puspita Saha ... ...For the State Petitioner renews the prayer for bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is in custody for a period in excess of 2 years and 7 months. He points out that out of 27 prosecution witnesses, only 5 were examined. He also points out that most of the dates, the prosecution witness are absent. One prosecution witness turned hostile. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court in the materials of the case diary. Petitioner stands implicated in the crime of murder. Trial is going on. Out of 27 prosecution witnesses, 5 were examined.

State will produce the prosecution witnesses at the trial so that unnecessary adjournments are not taken at the trial.

Considering the complicity of the petitioner in the heinous crime of murder as appearing from the materials in the case diary, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The application being C.R.M. (DB) 3694 of 2024 stands dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)