Bikash Pahari v. Shridham Maity

17.11.2025 Ct. No. 06 Sl. No.32 Cp C.O. No. 3915 of 2025 Bikash Pahari Vs.

Shridam Maity Mr. Shyamal Kr. Das Mr. S. K. Hota Ms. Krishna Yadav .....for the petitioner.

The petitioner has challenged an order dated September 1, 2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court at Barasat in Title Suit no. 14 of 2022.

This court does not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned. The learned court fixed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure for hearing. The application was filed by the petitioner in connection with Title Appeal No.14 of 2022. The petitioner submits that an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is also pending. The same is a prior application.

The petitioner is at liberty to approach the learned court for early disposal of the application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure as it is the petitioner's case that an electric meter of the opposite party is lying on the premises owned by the petitioner.

This court is of the view that there is no illegality in the impugned order and it is upto the learned court how to conduct the proceeding. However, the petitioner can make a prayer for early disposal of the pending application, along with the application which has been fixed.

The revisional application is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)