← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/4170/2022allowed

Kalu Dafadar v. State Of West Bengal

2022-11-28Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

28.11.2022 sdas allowed CRM(DB) No. 4170 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nakashipara Police Station Case No. 257 of 2021 dated 6.6.2021 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act subsequently charge-sheeted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Kalu Dafadar ...... petitioner Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder .....for the petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur, learned APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ..... for the State Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits he is in custody for 283 days. It is also submitted that he is not named in the F.I.R. His name also does not transpire from the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits bail prayer of co-accused, Arnab Sarkar @ Guddu was turned down by this Court in September, 2022. Petitioner had absconded for a considerable period of time. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Unlike Arnab Sarkar @ Guddu, his name has not transpired from the statements of witnesses recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He is in custody for a considerable period of time. There is little

possibility of the trial concluding in the near future. Under such circumstances, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia at Krishnanagar, subject to condition that petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)