Sahabuddin Sk @ Sahabuddin And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

28.11.2022 Serial no.39 Aloke CRM (A) 5511 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Beldanga Police Station Case No. 270 of 2022 dated 13.05.2022 under Sections 498A/323/325/307/326A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Sahabuddin Sk. @ Sahabuddin & Anr. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Jisan Iquabal Hossain, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Joydeep Roy, Advocate Mr. Asif Dewan, Advocate ... ...For the State Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Anisur Rahaman, Advocate Mr. D. Biswas, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the co-accused are in custody. The petitioners were not involved in the incident.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victim and to the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the child of the petitioner.

The de facto complainant is represented.

The victim apparently suffered acid burn injuries, although classified as simple.

The child of the petitioner implicates the petitioners in the incident.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 5511 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)