Rupchand Barman@Anil v. State Of West Bengal

29.11.2022.

30.

Ct.No.28 as (Rejected) C.R.M. (DB) 4185 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chakdah P.S. Case No.133 of 2022 dated 09.03.2022 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Rupchand Barman @ Anil.

... Petitioner.

Mr. Kushal Paul, Mr. Amar Krishna Saha, Mr. Satyajit Senapati, Mrs. Smita Singh.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. A.P.P., Mr. Manoranjan Mahata.

...for the State.

Petitioner is in custody for over 260 days. He submits he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. He prays for bail.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Statements of eye witnesses recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure implicate the petitioner in the crime. Their ocular version is corroborated by post mortem report.

Under such circumstances and gravity of the offence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)