Monorama Sau v. State Of W.B.

17.12.2024 Item No.40 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 26886 of 2006 Monorama Sau Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

The present writ petition of the year 2006 has been preferred by the writ petitioner praying for direction upon the respondents to cancel the appointment of respondent nos. 10, 11, 12 and 13.

There is no representation on behalf of either sides.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

WPA 26886 of 2006 is accordingly disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)