← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/26411/2024disposed

Manoj Chatterjee v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2024-10-29Hon'Ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)3 pages

29.10.2024 Ssi/ jayanta Ct. 3 WPA 26411 of 2024 Manoj Chatterjee -vsThe State of West Bengal & ors.

Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Pritam Roy Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee Ms. Sagnika Banerjee Ms. Aishwarya Bazaz ...for the petitioner Mr. Saptangshu Basu Mr. Debjit Mukherjee Mr. Subir Chatterjee Ms. Susmita Chatterjee Mr. Kaustav Bhattacharya Mr. Debanjan Das Ms. Priyanka Das ...for the Santosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Santosh Kr. Ray Ms. Rituparna Sanyal Ms. A. Guha ...for the respondent no.5 Ms. Sabnam De Bardhan Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty Ms. Sucheta Banerjee ...for the State Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

Report filed by the State is also taken on record. The present writ petition has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondents to provide assistance to the writ petitioners to take possession of the land/property in the present case which they have purchased by way of an auction. The said purchase has not been denied by the respondents. The original

owner who has not been made a party in the present case has appeared before this Court and submitted that there being a title dispute between the owners. Suits are still pending. On getting the information as to the said auction, the original owners have taken recourse to Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and approached the DRT for necessary reliefs. It is further submitted that notice has been served upon the writ petitioner and the next date is fixed on 30.10.2024. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State along with the learned counsel appearing for the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. who is the appropriate body for conducting the process under the said Act has appeared before the Court and submitted that though symbolic possession was taken by the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd, the actual physical possession has not been taken by the company.

It is further submitted that the writ petitioners are to approach the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd praying for necessary reliefs that is to acquire the possession in respect of the purchased property by way of an auction and the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. shall provide all assistance to the writ petitioners for the said process including police protection.

It appears that the writ petitioners have

approached the local police station directly and as such, they have not been provided any assistance. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the writ petitioners shall immediately approach the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. who shall assist the writ petitioners to get possession of the suit property in accordance with law and if necessary, take the assistance of the police. Parties shall act on a server copy downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)