Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2406/2025allowed

Md Golam Rosul @ Sagar @ Golam Rashul v. State Of West Bengal

2026-02-11Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

11.02.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.13 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.

Allowed C.R.M. (M) 2406 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Berhampore Police Station Case No. 1680 of dated 27.07.2025 under Sections 70(1)/143(4)/144(1)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 3/4/5/6 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

And In Re :

Md Golam Rosul @ Sagar @ Golam Rashul ... Petitioner.

Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Arnab Neogi, Mr. Sourav Samanta, Mr. Sujit Chakraborty ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Saibal Bapuli, APP, Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee ... For the State.

Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than 200 days; charge-sheet has already been submitted. As such, petitioner may be released on bail on any stringent condition.

Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail.

I have considered the whole of the statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the complicity of the present petitioner. Having considered the materials which are appearing so far as the present

petitioner is concerned, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Md Golam Rosul @ Sagar @ Golam Rashul shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Berhampore, Murshidabad.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned Special Court.

Case diary be returned to learned advocate appearing for the State.

The application for bail, being CRM (M) 2406 of 2025, is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)