← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/5584/2022allowed

Ujjal Mahato@Ujjwal Mahato And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-12-01Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

01.12.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 5584 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kumarganj Police Station Case No. 321 of 2022 dated 28.09.2022 under Sections 323/325/376/511/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Ujjal Mahato @ Ujjwal Mahato & Anr.

...... petitioners Ms. Minoti Gomes ....for the petitioners Ms. Faria Hossain Ms. Baisali Basu Ms. Mamata Jana ....for the State The incident, apparently, arose out of free fight between the parties in respect of disputes relating to ancestral properties.

None of the injured, apparently, suffered grievous hurt. In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once a month till

the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)