Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2415/2025allowed

Ketan Sengupta v. State Of West Bengal

2025-11-27Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

27.11.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 236.

Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2415 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Purba Jadavpur Police Station case no. 40 of 2025 dated 11.07.2025 under Sections 61(2)/3(5)/316(5)/318/341(1)/341(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Ketan Sengupta ......Petitioner.

Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Adv, Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Sr. Adv, Mr. Avik Ghatak Mr. Kausik De, Ms. Mohini Majumdar Mr. Roshan Pathak Mr. S. Chattopadhyay Mr. Akash Ghosh ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. PP Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Ms. Suveni Banerjee ......for the State.

Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Sr. Adv, Mr. Somopriyo Chowdhury Mr. Bikram Sarkar Ms. Iram Hassan Mr. Hemangshu B.

.....for the de-facto complainant.

Mr. Chatterjee, learned senior advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant submits that he has written instructions to not stand in the way in respect of the prayer for bail advanced on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned advocate for the State is present.

In view of the nature of the submissions advanced from the Bar and the written instructions submitted by the learned advocate for the de-facto complainant, I am of the view that

further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted. As such the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, petitioner namely, Ketan Sengupta shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore. If there are subsequent changes or there is failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the undertaking which has been advanced by one of his relation, in that case the defacto complainant and/or the State would be at liberty to approach this Court for cancellation of bail. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 2415 of 2025 is allowed.

Written instructions submitted by the de-facto complainant be kept with the record.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)