Rosidul Sk @ Rasidul Sk v. State Of West Bengal

13.11.2024 SG [REJECTED] C. R. M. (A) 3889 of 2024 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rejinagar Police Station Case No. 178 of 2024 dated 04.07.2024 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re: Rosidul Sk @ Rasidul Sk.

... ... Petitioner Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Ms. Poulami Bose ...... for the petitioner Mr. Saryati Dutta, Mr. Mainak Gupta.

...... for the State 1.

Petitioner submits he and his friends consumed intoxicating substances with the victim. Thereafter, the victim fell down and died. He has been falsely implicated. He prays for anticipatory bail.

2.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the materials on record. As per post mortem report deceased died due to injuries on the head and the jaw.

4.

In view of the aforesaid incriminating materials and gravity of offence, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail.

Signed By :

SOURAV GHOSH High Court of Calcutta 15 th of November 2024 06:24:24 AM

5.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SOURAV GHOSH High Court of Calcutta 15 th of November 2024 06:24:24 AM