Hena Parvin @ Hena Parveen v. State Of West Bengal

07.01.2026 Court No.28 Item No.275 ssi CRM (M) 2437 of 2025 In Re: - An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Harishchandrapur PS Case No.984 of dated 11.09.2025 under Sections 123/103(1)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of: Hena Parvin @ Hena Parveen ....Applicant/Petitioner.

Mr. Satadru Lahiri Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Raja Das ...for the petitioner Mr. Ikbal Kabir Ms. Suruchi Saha ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The marriage between the couple had taken place twenty years ago. Some time before this incident, the petitioner's daughter has committed suicide out of depression. The petitioner's husband also did so which led to the registration of the present case. The petitioner is in custody for nearly four months. Charge sheet has been submitted. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State strongly opposes the prayer for bail. He relies on the post-mortem report, the statements of neighbours and other witnesses. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary, the custody already suffered by the petitioner and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the application for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Chanchal and also be subject to the conditions that the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

The application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Jay Sengupta, J.)