← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4998/2023dismissed as rejected

Hasibul Khan And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-22Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

22.01.2024 Court No.29 Item No. 66 AP CRM (A) 4998 of 2023 In re : An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Uluberia Police Station Case No. 387 of 2023 dated 19.09.2023 under Sections 341/325/307/34 of IPC.

-AndIn the matter of : Hasibul Khan and Anr. ... ...Petitioners.

Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya ... ... For the Petitioners.

Mr. Avishek Sinha ... ...For the State The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that there is an issue of false implication. Moreover, the petitioners are of advanced age.

Learned advocate for the State submits that, there are criminal antecedents in so far as petitioners are concerned. There are five criminal cases against the petitioners. Both are rowdies.

Apparently, the de facto complainant, as an elderly social activist, complained as against the petitioners for encroachment of a highway. A writ petition was filed with regard thereto. Thereafter, the incident of assault took place. The de facto complainant suffered severe injuries.

The nature of injury sustained, require an investigation under Section 307 of the IPC, 1860. Moreover, there are criminal antecedents so far as petitioners are concerned. Hence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1 (Hasibul Khan) and 2 (Hafizul Khan).

Thus, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)