← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/3813/2024dismissed as rejected

Prasanta Bagdi @ Prasanta Kr. Bagdi v. State Of West Bengal

2025-02-13Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

13.02.2025 SL-61 (Item No.109 of the Daily CRM (DB) 3813 of 2024 List Dt.12.02.2025) (Bail Rejected) (AD) In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 in connection with Sessions Case No.160 of 2019 corresponding to Kanksa Police Station Case No.140 of 2019 dated 06.05.2019 under Sections 498A/302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and 3/4 of the D.P Act pending before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman.

-AndIn the matter of : Prasanta Bagdi @ Prasanta Kr. Bagdi ... ...Petitioner Mr. Apurba Kumar Dutta, Advocate Mr. Kuntal Banerjee, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Bitashok Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate ... ...For the State

1. Petitioner prays for grant of bail.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is in custody in excess of six years one month. Out of fifteen prosecution witnesses, only one was examined by the prosecution. There is no possibility of the trial ending any time soon.

3. Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that, the petitioner stands implicated in a murder. He points out that, although, the charges were framed in 2019 and the prosecution witness no.1 was examined in 2022, on at least ten days when both the Court and the prosecution witness Signed By :

ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 14 th of February 2025 01:33:23 PM

were present, defence did not cross-examine the prosecution witness.

4. Records made available in the present application suggest that, the petitioner before us was instrumental in delaying in the disposal of the trial.

5. In view of the complicity of the petitioner in the incident, the gravity of the offence and his conduct at the trial, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. CRM (DB) 3813 of 2024 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) Signed By :

ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 14 th of February 2025 01:33:23 PM